Quote:
Originally Posted by finplan101
I have a question for advice. I am looking at the trade offs of holding on to my existing home for a couple of years by leasing it before selling and buying a less expensive home for retirement. The thought is to allow for increased valuation. However, while leasing it would in effect lower my expense base due to lease income vs. renting during this time, I have other concerns/considerations.
My concern is that in 2 years, while value of home should increase, so will interest rates and price of newer home to be moved into for retirement (lower priced home). I would really like to lock in the cost and actual home for retirement, but I need the equity to do so. My current home is in a desireable area in CA and valued at about $1.5M, but suspect it will go to $1.6 or $1.7 when things come back. The retirement home to purchase is likely to be around $600K. Any advice?
|
In addition to the other comments made so far, there are a few things to evaluate that will help you make your decision.
First - What are rental houses going for in your neighborhood? Based on the rental prices will the rent cover the property's expenses and debt?
Second - If you would be upside down on the property on a monthly basis are you willing to put the cash into the house on the speculation that you'll get sufficient return either on the tax deductions or the eventual sale of the property?
Third - If the property will support itself when rented, do you have sufficient income or reserves to pay both mortgages if there is a month or two of vacancy between tenants?
I personally would not put myself in a position of needing to pay two mortgages unless I was absolutely certain that it would not cause me a hardship down the line.